Geyser
GeyserThe Inventor's Platform
HomeDirectoryProvisional AppMethodologyLogin / Sign Up

Technology Areas

  • Computing & Software
  • Telecommunications
  • Medical & Health
  • Biotechnology
  • Electrical Components
  • Vehicles & Transport

Data & Research

  • Reports & Analysis
  • Methodology
  • Citation Guidelines

Resources

  • USPTO ↗
  • CPC Classification ↗

Geyser Platform

  • Attorney Directory
  • Provisional Patent App
  • How It Works

Geyser Patent Attorney Directory

Data derived from public USPTO patent filing records and CPC codes. PatentFit Scores computed from practitioner-to-patent cross-reference analysis. See methodology.

Directory/Computing & Data Processing

Computing & Data Processing

G06

As of March 2026, the Geyser Patent Attorney Directory contains 14870 patent practitioners with verified filing records in Computing & Data Processing (CPC G06). These practitioners have filed a combined 20,973 patent applications, of which 12,770 have been granted, a 60.9% allowance rate. Of these, 6633 practitioners have PatentFit Scores rated “Strong” or “Exceptional.”

14870
Practitioners
20,973
Patents Filed
12,770
Patents Granted
60.9%
Allowance Rate

PatentFit Score Distribution

14870 practitioners

How 14870 Computing & Data Processing practitioners score on PatentFit

Exceptional85-100
2,277(15%)
Strong70-84
4,356(29%)
Good50-69
4,444(30%)
Moderate30-49
2,088(14%)
Limited0-29
1,705(11%)

6633 practitioners have “Strong” or “Exceptional” PatentFit Scores in Computing & Data Processing, meaning deep, recent filing history in CPC G06.

Find your top matches on Geyser

Filing Trend

Annual patent filings in CPC G06

276
10
368
11
347
12
394
13
478
14
763
15
1243
16
1295
17
1219
18
1239
19
1059
20
1002
21
1182
22
1874
23
3861
24
2576
25

Top Firms in Computing

Firms with the most Computing & Data Processing patent filings

1
Solo Practitioner
1558 practitioners12917 patents
2
PERKINS COIE LLP
58 practitioners1549 patents
3
CANTOR COLBURN LLP
46 practitioners1373 patents
4
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
39 practitioners1193 patents
5
IBM CORPORATION
27 practitioners1153 patents
6
DELL TECHNOLOGIES
5 practitioners1120 patents
7
EMC CORPORATION
5 practitioners1114 patents
8
DELL EMC
1 practitioners1113 patents

Find your top Computing & Data Processing match

Search the full Geyser directory to see individual practitioners ranked by PatentFit Score for your specific technology.

Search Computing Attorneys on Geyser

USPTO Art Units

2113424 patents
2161369 patents
2114315 patents
2154311 patents
2191310 patents
2168308 patents
3625298 patents
2184295 patents

Practitioners by State

CA2686
DC1220
TX1172
IL937
NY925
MA918
VA858
PA507
WA504
MN427
MI417
OH400
GA379
NC371
CO364

About CPC G06

Attorneys specializing in computer hardware, software systems, digital data processing, image processing, and computational methods.

View CPC definition ↗

Frequently Asked Questions About Computing & Data Processing Patent Attorneys

How many patent practitioners specialize in Computing & Data Processing?

As of March 2026, the Geyser Patent Attorney Directory database contains 14870 patent practitioners with verified filing records in Computing & Data Processing (CPC G06). These practitioners have filed a combined 20,973 patent applications in this technology area, with 12,770 granted (60.9% allowance rate).

What is the allowance rate for Computing & Data Processing patents?

The allowance rate for patent applications classified under Computing & Data Processing (CPC G06) is 60.9% in our database. The USPTO-wide average is approximately 61.6%. Practitioners with high PatentFit Scores in this area significantly outperform this average.

How do I find the best patent attorney for my Computing & Data Processing invention?

The Geyser Patent Attorney Directory analyzes 14870 practitioners with proven filing records in Computing & Data Processing. Of these, 6633 have PatentFit Scores rated "Strong" or "Exceptional," indicating deep specialization. You can search for your specific technology match on our directory.

What is PatentFit and how does it help me choose a patent attorney?

PatentFit is a composite score (0-100) measuring how well a practitioner's actual filing record aligns with a specific technology area. It combines Specialization Depth (35%), Allowance Rate (25%), Filing Recency (20%), and Experience (20%). Full methodology at https://patentgeyser.com/methodology.

Does location matter when choosing a Computing & Data Processing patent attorney?

No. Patent practitioners are registered with the USPTO, a federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction. A patent attorney in any U.S. state can file and prosecute patent applications for inventors located anywhere. What matters is their proven expertise in your specific technology area.