Geyser
GeyserThe Inventor's Platform
HomeDirectoryProvisional AppMethodologyLogin / Sign Up

Technology Areas

  • Computing & Software
  • Telecommunications
  • Medical & Health
  • Biotechnology
  • Electrical Components
  • Vehicles & Transport

Data & Research

  • Reports & Analysis
  • Methodology
  • Citation Guidelines

Resources

  • USPTO ↗
  • CPC Classification ↗

Geyser Platform

  • Attorney Directory
  • Provisional Patent App
  • How It Works

Geyser Patent Attorney Directory

Data derived from public USPTO patent filing records and CPC codes. PatentFit Scores computed from practitioner-to-patent cross-reference analysis. See methodology.

18,229 practitioners · 44,579 patents · 113 technology areas

Your invention deserves an attorney who already knows your technology

Geyser Patent Attorney Directory cross-references 18,229 patent practitioners with 44,579 USPTO filings across 113 CPC technology classifications. We show you who has actually filed patents in your exact technology area, not who markets themselves as experts.

Start by finding your technology area below.

Login / Sign Up
18,229
Registered Practitioners
44,579
Patents Analyzed
113
Technology Areas
55.7%
Avg. Allowance Rate

Technology Specializations

Every practitioner in our database is indexed by the CPC codes of patents they've actually filed. Select a technology area to see the expertise landscape: how many specialists exist, what allowance rates look like, and how PatentFit Scores distribute.

Computing & Data Processing

G06
14870 specialists20,973 patents
60.9% granted

Electric Communication Technology

H04
14045 specialists18,361 patents
64.5% granted

Measuring & Testing

G01
6564 specialists998 patents
63.5% granted

Climate Change Mitigation Technology

Y02
6283 specialists1,275 patents
73.7% granted

Controlling & Regulating Systems

G05
5783 specialists1,011 patents
62.4% granted

Bioinformatics & Health Informatics

G16
5423 specialists670 patents
73.9% granted

Information Storage

G11
5185 specialists858 patents
62.5% granted

Electronic Circuitry

H03
4369 specialists749 patents
67.8% granted

Technical Subjects (Legacy USPC)

Y10
4113 specialists437 patents
57.7% granted

Medical & Veterinary Science

A61
4019 specialists373 patents
71.3% granted

Education & Display Devices

G09
3849 specialists401 patents
61.3% granted

Checking & Counting Devices

G07
3563 specialists347 patents
57.1% granted

Why Specialization Beats Location

Patent practitioners are registered with the USPTO, a federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction. A practitioner in Texas can file patents for an inventor in Massachusetts with identical authority. What determines patent success is technology-specific: depth of filing history in the relevant CPC classification, allowance rate in that area, and familiarity with the art units that examine those applications.

01

Filing Depth Matters

Practitioners with 50+ filings in a CPC class have 2-3x higher allowance rates than generalists entering the same area.

02

Art Unit Familiarity

Each technology area is examined by specific USPTO art units. Practitioners who regularly appear before the same examiners build procedural advantages.

03

Recency Is Critical

Patent law and examiner expectations evolve. A practitioner's recent filings (last 3 years) are weighted heavily in PatentFit scoring.

Find Your Top Matches on Geyser™

Search 18,229 practitioners by technology. See who has actually filed patents in your exact area.

Find Your Attorney

Free to use · 18,229 practitioners indexed