Geyser
GeyserThe Inventor's Platform
HomeDirectoryProvisional AppMethodologyLogin / Sign Up

Technology Areas

  • Computing & Software
  • Telecommunications
  • Medical & Health
  • Biotechnology
  • Electrical Components
  • Vehicles & Transport

Data & Research

  • Reports & Analysis
  • Methodology
  • Citation Guidelines

Resources

  • USPTO ↗
  • CPC Classification ↗

Geyser Platform

  • Attorney Directory
  • Provisional Patent App
  • How It Works

Geyser Patent Attorney Directory

Data derived from public USPTO patent filing records and CPC codes. PatentFit Scores computed from practitioner-to-patent cross-reference analysis. See methodology.

Directory/Education & Display Devices

Education & Display Devices

G09

As of February 2026, the Geyser Patent Attorney Directory contains 3849 patent practitioners with verified filing records in Education & Display Devices (CPC G09). These practitioners have filed a combined 401 patent applications, of which 246 have been granted, a 61.3% allowance rate. Of these, 266 practitioners have PatentFit Scores rated “Strong” or “Exceptional.”

3849
Practitioners
401
Patents Filed
246
Patents Granted
61.3%
Allowance Rate

PatentFit Score Distribution

3849 practitioners

How 3849 Education & Display Devices practitioners score on PatentFit

Exceptional85-100
0(0%)
Strong70-84
266(7%)
Good50-69
1,544(40%)
Moderate30-49
982(26%)
Limited0-29
1,057(27%)

266 practitioners have “Strong” or “Exceptional” PatentFit Scores in Education & Display Devices, meaning deep, recent filing history in CPC G09.

Find your top matches on Geyser

Filing Trend

Annual patent filings in CPC G09

3
10
4
11
7
12
5
13
7
14
15
15
26
16
49
17
22
18
31
19
21
20
15
21
14
22
30
23
45
24
28
25

Top Firms in Display

Firms with the most Education & Display Devices patent filings

1
Solo Practitioner
348 practitioners252 patents
2
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND AND STOCKTON
2 practitioners25 patents
3
CANTOR COLBURN LLP
2 practitioners24 patents
4
QUALCOMM INC.
10 practitioners22 patents
5
SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
39 practitioners22 patents
6
PERKINS COIE, LLP
12 practitioners21 patents
7
KLARQUIST SPARKMAN LLP
1 practitioners20 patents
8
ONE APPLE PARK WAY
1 practitioners20 patents

Find your top Education & Display Devices match

Search the full Geyser directory to see individual practitioners ranked by PatentFit Score for your specific technology.

Search Display Attorneys on Geyser

USPTO Art Units

242217 patents
217417 patents
248116 patents
267314 patents
217513 patents
267512 patents
242511 patents
217310 patents

Practitioners by State

CA580
DC540
TX344
VA253
IL250
NY229
MA197
WA120
NJ115
OH113
NC106
UT98
MI94
GA83
CO81

About CPC G09

Patent expertise in educational apparatus, display boards, and information presentation.

View CPC definition ↗

Frequently Asked Questions About Education & Display Devices Patent Attorneys

How many patent practitioners specialize in Education & Display Devices?

As of February 2026, the Geyser Patent Attorney Directory database contains 3849 patent practitioners with verified filing records in Education & Display Devices (CPC G09). These practitioners have filed a combined 401 patent applications in this technology area, with 246 granted (61.3% allowance rate).

What is the allowance rate for Education & Display Devices patents?

The allowance rate for patent applications classified under Education & Display Devices (CPC G09) is 61.3% in our database. The USPTO-wide average is approximately 61.6%. Practitioners with high PatentFit Scores in this area significantly outperform this average.

How do I find the best patent attorney for my Education & Display Devices invention?

The Geyser Patent Attorney Directory analyzes 3849 practitioners with proven filing records in Education & Display Devices. Of these, 266 have PatentFit Scores rated "Strong" or "Exceptional," indicating deep specialization. You can search for your specific technology match on our directory.

What is PatentFit and how does it help me choose a patent attorney?

PatentFit is a composite score (0-100) measuring how well a practitioner's actual filing record aligns with a specific technology area. It combines Specialization Depth (35%), Allowance Rate (25%), Filing Recency (20%), and Experience (20%). Full methodology at https://patentgeyser.com/methodology.

Does location matter when choosing a Education & Display Devices patent attorney?

No. Patent practitioners are registered with the USPTO, a federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction. A patent attorney in any U.S. state can file and prosecute patent applications for inventors located anywhere. What matters is their proven expertise in your specific technology area.