Geyser
GeyserThe Inventor's Platform
HomeDirectoryProvisional AppMethodologyLogin / Sign Up

Technology Areas

  • Computing & Software
  • Telecommunications
  • Medical & Health
  • Biotechnology
  • Electrical Components
  • Vehicles & Transport

Data & Research

  • Reports & Analysis
  • Methodology
  • Citation Guidelines

Resources

  • USPTO ↗
  • CPC Classification ↗

Geyser Platform

  • Attorney Directory
  • Provisional Patent App
  • How It Works

Geyser Patent Attorney Directory

Data derived from public USPTO patent filing records and CPC codes. PatentFit Scores computed from practitioner-to-patent cross-reference analysis. See methodology.

Directory/Electric Communication Technology

Electric Communication Technology

H04

As of February 2026, the Geyser Patent Attorney Directory contains 14045 patent practitioners with verified filing records in Electric Communication Technology (CPC H04). These practitioners have filed a combined 18,361 patent applications, of which 11,836 have been granted, a 64.5% allowance rate. Of these, 6162 practitioners have PatentFit Scores rated “Strong” or “Exceptional.”

14045
Practitioners
18,361
Patents Filed
11,836
Patents Granted
64.5%
Allowance Rate

PatentFit Score Distribution

14045 practitioners

How 14045 Electric Communication Technology practitioners score on PatentFit

Exceptional85-100
1,970(14%)
Strong70-84
4,192(30%)
Good50-69
4,363(31%)
Moderate30-49
1,998(14%)
Limited0-29
1,522(11%)

6162 practitioners have “Strong” or “Exceptional” PatentFit Scores in Electric Communication Technology, meaning deep, recent filing history in CPC H04.

Find your top matches on Geyser

Filing Trend

Annual patent filings in CPC H04

251
10
312
11
359
12
350
13
481
14
690
15
1228
16
1328
17
1239
18
1075
19
1028
20
974
21
962
22
1295
23
3110
24
1555
25

Top Firms in Telecom

Firms with the most Electric Communication Technology patent filings

1
Solo Practitioner
1463 practitioners12392 patents
2
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
114 practitioners2219 patents
3
ARENT FOX LLP
28 practitioners2067 patents
4
LOZA & LOZA, LLP
27 practitioners1896 patents
5
QUALCOMM INC.
10 practitioners1869 patents
6
QUALCOMM
4 practitioners1632 patents
7
MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C
26 practitioners1613 patents
8
QUALCOMM, INC.
11 practitioners1594 patents

Find your top Electric Communication Technology match

Search the full Geyser directory to see individual practitioners ranked by PatentFit Score for your specific technology.

Search Telecom Attorneys on Geyser

USPTO Art Units

2469432 patents
2463322 patents
2471299 patents
2435295 patents
2474289 patents
2482287 patents
2457285 patents
2425279 patents

Practitioners by State

CA2506
DC1170
TX1102
NY889
IL872
MA844
VA830
WA494
PA463
MN409
MI405
OH388
GA370
NC352
CO345

About CPC H04

Patent expertise in telecommunications, wireless networks, image transmission, multiplexing, and communication protocols.

View CPC definition ↗

Frequently Asked Questions About Electric Communication Technology Patent Attorneys

How many patent practitioners specialize in Electric Communication Technology?

As of February 2026, the Geyser Patent Attorney Directory database contains 14045 patent practitioners with verified filing records in Electric Communication Technology (CPC H04). These practitioners have filed a combined 18,361 patent applications in this technology area, with 11,836 granted (64.5% allowance rate).

What is the allowance rate for Electric Communication Technology patents?

The allowance rate for patent applications classified under Electric Communication Technology (CPC H04) is 64.5% in our database. The USPTO-wide average is approximately 61.6%. This above-average rate suggests favorable prosecution conditions in this technology area.

How do I find the best patent attorney for my Electric Communication Technology invention?

The Geyser Patent Attorney Directory analyzes 14045 practitioners with proven filing records in Electric Communication Technology. Of these, 6162 have PatentFit Scores rated "Strong" or "Exceptional," indicating deep specialization. You can search for your specific technology match on our directory.

What is PatentFit and how does it help me choose a patent attorney?

PatentFit is a composite score (0-100) measuring how well a practitioner's actual filing record aligns with a specific technology area. It combines Specialization Depth (35%), Allowance Rate (25%), Filing Recency (20%), and Experience (20%). Full methodology at https://patentgeyser.com/methodology.

Does location matter when choosing a Electric Communication Technology patent attorney?

No. Patent practitioners are registered with the USPTO, a federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction. A patent attorney in any U.S. state can file and prosecute patent applications for inventors located anywhere. What matters is their proven expertise in your specific technology area.