Geyser
GeyserThe Inventor's Platform
HomeDirectoryProvisional AppMethodologyLogin / Sign Up

Technology Areas

  • Computing & Software
  • Telecommunications
  • Medical & Health
  • Biotechnology
  • Electrical Components
  • Vehicles & Transport

Data & Research

  • Reports & Analysis
  • Methodology
  • Citation Guidelines

Resources

  • USPTO ↗
  • CPC Classification ↗

Geyser Platform

  • Attorney Directory
  • Provisional Patent App
  • How It Works

Geyser Patent Attorney Directory

Data derived from public USPTO patent filing records and CPC codes. PatentFit Scores computed from practitioner-to-patent cross-reference analysis. See methodology.

Directory/Gas & Liquid Storage

Gas & Liquid Storage

F17

As of February 2026, the Geyser Patent Attorney Directory contains 21 patent practitioners with verified filing records in Gas & Liquid Storage (CPC F17). These practitioners have filed a combined 6 patent applications, of which 2 have been granted, a 33.3% allowance rate.

21
Practitioners
6
Patents Filed
2
Patents Granted
33.3%
Allowance Rate

PatentFit Score Distribution

21 practitioners

How 21 Gas & Liquid Storage practitioners score on PatentFit

Exceptional85-100
0(0%)
Strong70-84
0(0%)
Good50-69
3(14%)
Moderate30-49
0(0%)
Limited0-29
18(86%)

Filing Trend

Annual patent filings in CPC F17

1
15
2
23
1
24
2
25

Top Firms in Storage Vessels

Firms with the most Gas & Liquid Storage patent filings

1
Solo Practitioner
4 practitioners5 patents
2
METIS IP LLC
1 practitioners3 patents
3
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
1 practitioners1 patents
4
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2 practitioners1 patents
5
SCHMEISER OLSEN & WATTS, LLP
1 practitioners1 patents
6
GLOBAL IP SERVICES, PLLC
1 practitioners1 patents
7
SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS, LLP
1 practitioners1 patents
8
SCHMELSER, OLSEN & WATTS LLP
1 practitioners1 patents

Find your top Gas & Liquid Storage match

Search the full Geyser directory to see individual practitioners ranked by PatentFit Score for your specific technology.

Search Storage Vessels Attorneys on Geyser

USPTO Art Units

21162 patents
21192 patents
21171 patents
21231 patents

Practitioners by State

NY7
CA3
AZ2
MD2
NC2
FL1
MN1
VA1
IL1
MA1

About CPC F17

Attorneys specializing in pressure vessels, gas storage, and pipeline technology.

View CPC definition ↗

Frequently Asked Questions About Gas & Liquid Storage Patent Attorneys

How many patent practitioners specialize in Gas & Liquid Storage?

As of February 2026, the Geyser Patent Attorney Directory database contains 21 patent practitioners with verified filing records in Gas & Liquid Storage (CPC F17). These practitioners have filed a combined 6 patent applications in this technology area, with 2 granted (33.3% allowance rate).

What is the allowance rate for Gas & Liquid Storage patents?

The allowance rate for patent applications classified under Gas & Liquid Storage (CPC F17) is 33.3% in our database. The USPTO-wide average is approximately 61.6%. Practitioners with high PatentFit Scores in this area significantly outperform this average.

How do I find the best patent attorney for my Gas & Liquid Storage invention?

The Geyser Patent Attorney Directory analyzes 21 practitioners with proven filing records in Gas & Liquid Storage. Of these, 0 have PatentFit Scores rated "Strong" or "Exceptional," indicating deep specialization. You can search for your specific technology match on our directory.

What is PatentFit and how does it help me choose a patent attorney?

PatentFit is a composite score (0-100) measuring how well a practitioner's actual filing record aligns with a specific technology area. It combines Specialization Depth (35%), Allowance Rate (25%), Filing Recency (20%), and Experience (20%). Full methodology at https://patentgeyser.com/methodology.

Does location matter when choosing a Gas & Liquid Storage patent attorney?

No. Patent practitioners are registered with the USPTO, a federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction. A patent attorney in any U.S. state can file and prosecute patent applications for inventors located anywhere. What matters is their proven expertise in your specific technology area.